Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs                           University of Minnesota
  Home | Initiatives | Events | Elections | Reports | Public Opinion | Blog               Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs

Wisconsin: Gambling

 

Indian Casinos

 

Expansion of Indian Casino Rights

Poll Date
Favor
Oppose
No opinion
Sample MoE
WPR / St. Norbert College2 March 6-14, 2004
47%
48%
6%
401 ± 4.9
Badger Poll1 January 27 -
February 3, 2004
46%
46%
7%
500 ± 4.0
Badger Poll1 May 13-21, 2003
47%
47%
5%
503 ± 4.0
Badger Poll1 March 4-12, 2003
52%
44%
4%
504 ± 4.0

1 "Over the past year, Governor Doyle has been making deals with Indian tribes allowing them to expand their gambling and essentially making the arrangements permanent instead of expiring every few years, in exchange for a bigger cut of their gambling money for the state. In general, do you favor or oppose these deals?"

2 "Governor Doyle is currently negotiating with the Indian tribes in the state to include more games and to extend the hours of operations for the casinos. Do you favor or oppose these gaming compacts?"

 

Impact of Indian Casinos on Wisconsin

Poll Date
Good
Bad
No difference
No
opinion
Sample MoE
Badger Poll1 January 27 -
February 3, 2004
37%
25%
33%
5%
500 ± 4.0
Badger Poll1 March 4-12, 2003
52%
12%
31%
5%
504 ± 4.0

1 "In general, do you think having the Indian casinos has been good for Wisconsin, bad for Wisconsin, or not really made much difference one way or the other?"

 

Executive vs. Legislative Approval of Indian Gaming Compacts

Poll Date
Legislature
should vote
Remain with
Governor
No
opinion
Sample MoE
WPR / St.
Norbert College1
March 6-14, 2003
69%
28%
3%
400 ± 5.0

1 "The State Legislature wants the right to vote on whether to approve or disapprove of the Indian Gaming Compacts. Currently, the Governor is solely responsible for their approval or disapproval. Do you think the state legislature should be able to vote on whether to approve the compacts, or do you think it should remain up to the Governor?"